In article <4e5f3d$52j@tkhut.sojourn.com>, mharrell@sojourn1.sojourn.com
(Matt Harrell) wrote:
> I can't imagine anyone worrying about _BYTE_ being too thin. You
> could almost kill someone with an issue!
> I agree to some degree that they spend too much time on IBM
> clone topics. They have said before that they devote time in the mag
> that is roughly proportional to market share. This may be the case,
Fat chance. For example, they recently published an article on 32 bit OSs.
They couldn't be bothered to include MacOS (which has been 32 bit longer
than any of the other ones they mentioned), but they included Linux.
Market share?
Besides, it's not _just_ the quantity of coverage--it's the quality. The
same issue cited above _included MacOS in an article on the flaws of each
major OS. Now that's _real_ fair. Leave the MacOS out of the favorable
article about OS features, but include it in the article about bugs.
--
Regards, Joe Ragosta
Copyright Joseph M. Ragosta, 1995. Non-exclusive, royalty free license to distribute this post granted to any service provider except Microsoft. Fee for Microsoft is $1,000 per posting.